This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
On X, Kurt Caz dismissed criticism of the thumbnail as "clickbait" and said "if you're going to do a hit piece on me do it properly".，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Continue reading...，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载
A Google spokesperson told the BBC: "We're deeply sorry for this mistake. We've removed the offensive notification and are working to prevent this from happening again."